ENDS Registry

Electronic Nicotine Delivery System

Oppose the creation of a statewide Tobacco and Electronic Nicotine Delivery System (ENDS) Retailer Registry in Pennsylvania.

Key Concerns:

  • A retailer registry does not prevent youth initiation or reduce tobacco use.
  • These policies have been supported by the tobacco industry in other states to appear proactive while avoiding stronger regulation.
  • No restrictions on location, density, or proximity to schools are included in the current registry proposals.
  • Funding for this registry could be better used to support evidence-based prevention and cessation programs.

 

Why a Registry is Not the Solution:

Real prevention means reducing access and holding the industry accountable—not tracking store names in a database. Youth in Pennsylvania continue to face targeted marketing and easy access to flavored and addictive products. A registry does not:

  • Limit how many stores can sell ENDS in a given area
  • Stop sales near schools or youth centers
  • Include enforcement measures or penalties for violations
  • Prevent the sale of flavored or high-nicotine products

Instead of investing in a system that simply monitors the problem, we need bold, enforceable action that prevents it entirely.

For the ENDS Retailer Registry Opposition One Pager

Why It Matters

While a registry may sound like a step forward, the proposed ENDS retailer registry in Pennsylvania would do little to prevent youth tobacco use and instead normalize the sale of dangerous products across the state. This kind of policy can create the illusion of regulation while offering no real protections for public health, youth, or communities already targeted by the tobacco industry.

A registry does not reduce access, limit retailer density near schools, or restrict marketing tactics. In fact, it can open the door to industry influence by legitimizing the widespread sale of addictive nicotine products under a weak administrative framework.